(for a relatively short time, apparently one to two years,
before the project ceased development entirely)

See #1 (comment 6978)
for details.

Thanks to Stefano Maffulli for pointing it out.

Write the conclusion; make a few tweaks to the Executive Summary; add
a CC-BY-SA copyright notice; make various minor wording changes
throughout the document; change all ``uneven" quotation marks to
``even'' quotation marks (apparently both are valid LaTeX, but... I
mean... do I even have to explain why the first bothers me?  Was I
raised by wolves?  No.  No, I was not.  Furthermore, Emacs' syntax
colorization handles the second but not the first); put an
introductory paragraph before the BUSL table; in the BUSL table, add
question marks next to some dates about which we are uncertain.

(Not everyone has posted an announcement or discussion when adopting
BUSL.)

Also: add a phrase about reasons why some people prefer or don't
prefer AGPL, and make some unrelated spacing changes.  (Normally I
don't like mixing semantic changes with formatting changes, but we're
working fast here, plus I really want to beat Seth to the merge.)

Also, respond to Seth's comment from commit 8cab8dae.

This was Seth's excellent advice.  The former is a term of art in
U.S. antitrust law, and using it could set off alarm bells for some
readers that we don't want to set off.

But not quite close enough yet to remove the "WIP" prefix from this
commit message nor the "DRAFT" watermark from the report.

By now you're probably wondering when this is going to end.  One
answer is that the sun will run out of hydrogen in approximately 5
billion years.  So there is, at least, an upper limit here.

See my other recent commit and you'll get the idea.

So much change; I recommend you not even bother with the diff.
This follows commit b5759c2a in both sequence and spirit.

This change, and others from me immediately following it, are part of
one long editing pass to get this report into final form (while Seth
is resolving any still-unresolved citations).  There's no point in
trying to write a detailed log message for each commit, since the
commits are just checkpoints anyway; the best way to know what
happened is to just look at the diff.