Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
D
Delayed Open Source Publication -- Report
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
ots
Delayed Open Source Publication -- Report
Commits
d3220ce3
Commit
d3220ce3
authored
1 year ago
by
Karl Fogel
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Adjust anti-competition item in Executive Summary
parent
f6885611
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
dosp-survey.ltx
+4
-11
4 additions, 11 deletions
dosp-survey.ltx
with
4 additions
and
11 deletions
dosp-survey.ltx
+
4
−
11
View file @
d3220ce3
...
...
@@ -106,17 +106,10 @@ We saw two trends that seem significant:
users, not merely to developers.
More recently, however, some DOSP licenses are about preventing
any licensee from using the software in a product that competes
with certain specific types of software that are strategically
important to the licensor, regardless of revenue. See Section
\ref{anti-competition}.
% TODO I think we should mention ``service" here and I'm not
% exactly sure that ``regardless of revenue" is right (although
% I agree it's not about monopolizing revenue from software
% license fees!). The most common pattern overall is some
% variant of ``the original licensor is the only one who may
% provide a service consisting of the direct use of the
% software" (which service is expected to be provided for pay).
any licensee from using the software in a product or service that
competes with certain specific types of software that are
strategically important to the licensor, independently of direct
revenue. See Section \ref{anti-competition}.
\end{itemize}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment