Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Dec 02, 2020
    • Karl Fogel's avatar
      Use 'enumitem' package instead of 'enumerate' · d669a955
      Karl Fogel authored
      The former supersedes the latter, and has more options, so we should
      use it.  But the proxemitae cause for this change is that I wanted to
      use lower-case Roman letters as item markers instead of numbers.  Now,
      you might think it would work to just put "\usepackage{enumitem}" at
      the top of the doc and then use "\begin{enumerate}[label=\alph*)]",
      but no, that gets an error:
      
        ! Missing number, treated as zero.
        <to be read again>
                           \c@*
        l.394 \begin{enumerate}[label=\alph*)]
      
        !  ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
      
      The reason for this is that the two packages are incompatible.  With
      'enumerate' already loaded, if you load 'enumitem' and then try to
      take advantage of the feature for which you brought in 'enumitem' in
      the first place, you'll get the above error.
      
      This change should not break any of our older documents, since both
      packages work fine for plain old enumerations or lists, and until now
      that's all we could do -- we obviously weren't using the list-item
      styling feature that 'enumitem' makes possible.  I also spot-checked
      several of OTS's more complex documents to make sure they still build.
      d669a955
  2. May 04, 2019
  3. Mar 24, 2019
    • Karl Fogel's avatar
      Supply the \fullref command · 455a87ab
      Karl Fogel authored
      We had been repeating this command definition in the preamble of all
      our LaTeX documents; now we don't have to do that anymore.
      455a87ab
  4. Apr 10, 2018
Loading