Newer
Older
future.
If some of the most popular DOSP-relicensed projects had started
out under DOSP rather than Open Source terms from the outset,
would they have attracted the same level of interest and adoption?
\item \textbf{Why has a fork of Terraform attracted so many
contributions and so much interest compared to forks of other
projects?} % TODO: See ref:091db178 -- maybe this question
% should be recast.
It's too early to say whether the OpenTofu project will broadly
outcompete Terraform among various audiences, but it's clear that
this fork started off with a bang, immediately garnering
substantial interest, sponsorships and financial commitments, and
endorsements from various companies and developers. However, Open
Source forks of other HashiCorp projects are comparatively
stagnant and underpublicized. Similarly, other BUSL relicensing
events did not seem to result in highly active forks (although
some may have increased interest in existing Open Source
competitors to the relicensed projects).
What's special about the OpenTofu effort, or about Terraform or
its community, that could account for these differences? Did
Terraform's market share in its niche play a large role? Was
Terraform particularly indispensable for its users in comparison
to some other relicensed projects?
\numberedsection{Sources and References}\label{sources}
\begin{itemize}
\item \otscite{Creative Commons Final Report: On the Viability and
Development of Springing Licenses}\\
\otsurl{https://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Springing-licenses-FINAL.pdf}
% https://writing.kemitchell.com/2023/10/24/Scheduled-Relicensing
\item \otscite{Wikipedia: List of Commercial Video Games With Later Released Source Code}\\
\otsurl{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_commercial\_video\_games\_with\_later\_released\_source\_code}
\end{itemize}
\numberedsection{Acknowledgements}\label{acknowledgements-sow}
TBD
% Two examples learned from https://blog.adamretter.org.uk/business-source-license-adoption/