Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit ed2d40b2 authored by Seth Schoen's avatar Seth Schoen
Browse files

Try to make point about kinds of "visibility" clearer

parent 13788d2b
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing
with 1 addition and 5 deletions
dosp-survey.ltx
+ 1
− 5
View file @ ed2d40b2
...@@ -265,11 +265,7 @@ why it hasn't happened yet, and describe (sometimes vaguely) the ...@@ -265,11 +265,7 @@ why it hasn't happened yet, and describe (sometimes vaguely) the
conditions that will trigger a re-licensing toward Open Source. conditions that will trigger a re-licensing toward Open Source.
There are many possible reasons why a project might start out with some public There are many possible reasons why a project might start out with some public
visibility but not yet ship Open Source code. The ones we have observed:\footnote{CITE everything in this list} visibility, whether of source or binaries, but not initially ship Open Source code. The ones we have observed:\footnote{CITE everything in this list}
% TODO: Karl notes: the first two items in the list below would argue
% against source code visibility at all, not just against visibility
% under Open Source license. We might want to make that clearer.
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item shame about poor code quality \item shame about poor code quality
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment