Note what I found out about Hudson->Jenkins

As per conversation with Alex Scammon.

notes.md

@@ -130,6 +130,17 @@ need followup.
 
   (suggested by @Zaeraxa in reply to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37745772)
 
+* INAPPLICABLE Hudson->Jenkins
+
+  Alex Scammon mentioned the Hudson->Jenkins transition to Karl.  But
+  on looking more closely into [the
+  history](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenkins_(software)), it looks
+  like this was not about licensing, but rather about community
+  influence vs corporate (Oracle) influence on shared project
+  decisions.  ([This
+  article](https://www.infoworld.com/article/2624986/oracle-s-open-source-missteps-continue-with-hudson-project.html)
+  seems to give a good overview of what happened.)
+
 # An annoying nomenclature problem
 
 Even though we seem to think that the Business Source License should be
@@ -236,3 +247,4 @@ know](https://code.librehq.com/ots/dosp-research/-/issues/new)!
 * Sam Ramji
 * Heather Meeker
 * Abby Kearns
+* Alex Scammon