Add projects mentioned in reply to Karl's inquiry

notes.md

@@ -54,6 +54,28 @@ need followup.
   - uses its self-rolled _"Delayed Open Source Attribution License"_ 
   - [license file on GH](https://github.com/ChildMindInstitute/mindlogger-applet-builder/blob/master/LICENSE.md)
 
+* Akka (BUSL) [license FAQ](https://www.lightbend.com/akka/license-faq)
+
+* CockroachDB (BUSL) [licensing FAQs](https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/stable/licensing-faqs)
+
+* FreeBSD netgraph
+
+* MariaDB
+
+* MkDocs
+
+* "northroadgeo" projects [delayed open source mechanism not immediately clear?](https://north-road.com/#)
+
+* Onivim 2 (was this unplanned?) [issue](https://github.com/onivim/oni2/issues/3771)
+
+* OPSI ["co-funding"](https://www.opsi.org/de/dokumentation/opsi-lizenz-und-copyright https://forum.opsi.org/viewtopic.php?t=1193)
+
+* OTRS (open source -> delayed -> proprietary)
+
+* Pixelfed ["will be open sourced when we reach v1"](https://pixelfed.org/mobile-apps)
+
+* Qt (officially delayed releases in the past??)
+
 # Taxonomy
 
 I (Seth) think there's a distinction to be made between these three cases:

unscheduled.md

@@ -10,10 +10,19 @@ open source publication was "delayed".
 * Qt
 
 ... and probably dozens, if not hundreds, of codebases that were released
-after companies that were developing them shut down.
+after companies that were developing them shut down. (But some people say
+Blender does not belong in this category.)
+
+Other examples shared with us that seem to have been "unscheduled":
+
+* Stackrocks, 3scale, Quay.io, and other Red Hat acquisitions
+* Kallisto
+* MS-DOS early versions (!!)
+* UNIX (the original one from Bell Labs)
 
 Maybe more ambiguous cases:
 
 * Games from id software (routinely released/relicensed after the end of
   their main commercial viability, but not on a schedule and not with a
   public commitment to do so?)
+* Ghidra (classified government internal software to declassified open source)