From 1467615499a14bb3dc92750bb2a3b2186c095df7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seth Schoen <schoen@loyalty.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:17:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add explicit note about grace period vs. DOSP

---
 dosp-survey.ltx | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/dosp-survey.ltx b/dosp-survey.ltx
index 0b8b787..27d9ca7 100644
--- a/dosp-survey.ltx
+++ b/dosp-survey.ltx
@@ -281,6 +281,12 @@ Initiative, it appears to us to be compatible with the Open Source
 Definition, and --- unlike BUSL, for instance --- is claimed by its
 authors to be a form of open source licensing.
 
+One way to view the distinction between delayed open-source licensing and
+grace period reciprocal licensing is that the former aims to compromise
+between proprietary and open source licensing, where the latter aims
+to compromise between permissive and reciprocal licensing --- in both
+cases by modifying the license terms after a delay.
+
 \numberedsection{Other Terminology and Practices}\label{terminology}
 
 We've encountered a number of other terms that can describe DOSP or
-- 
GitLab