diff --git a/dosp-survey.ltx b/dosp-survey.ltx
index 30436d7acc84cff651f4d02157feb629db7d50f3..a898fa2a1463a079543e3021d30f89f4d292cf24 100644
--- a/dosp-survey.ltx
+++ b/dosp-survey.ltx
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ uses from BUSL's ``production use" restrictions---complicates direct
 comparison of uses of the BUSL; we have not yet devised a taxonomy
 for making these comparisons.
 
-% TODO Sort this table by date of BUSL adoption? ("BUSL date")
+% TODO Sort this table by date of BUSL adoption
 \begin{longtable}[l]{l l l l l}
 \textbf{Project} & \textbf{BUSL date} & \textbf{Change Date} & \textbf{Change License} & \textbf{Reference} \\
 
@@ -289,8 +289,7 @@ SurrealDB & 2021-12-14 & rel. +4 years & Apache v2 & REF \\
 % https://github.com/surrealdb/surrealdb/blob/main/LICENSE
 
 Terraform (etc.) & 2023-08-10 & rel. +4 years & MPL 2.0 & REF \\
-% TODO Maybe we should list each individual HashiCorp product to which
-%      this relicensing applied, instead of the umbrella "etc."
+% TODO Can have a list in a footnote
 
 ZeroTier & 2019-08-28 & 5th cal. year & Apache v2 & REF \\
 \end{longtable}
@@ -450,7 +449,7 @@ focus on clarity and persistent documentation of specific license
 grants to specific code and project versions.
 
 \numberedsection{``Grace Period" Reciprocal Licensing}\label{grace}
-% TODO: Maybe this should go as a subsection of the "differences from
+% TODO: This can go as a subsection of the "differences from
 %       other licensing strategies" section?
 
 One licensing practice often described as related to DOSP is implemented