From f1f1a5d0e981a0edba01fccaedc9923108ddf8fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 23:10:23 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Note Kyle Mitchell's "scheduled relicensing" post

---
 notes.md | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/notes.md b/notes.md
index eb31113..a1a0ae6 100644
--- a/notes.md
+++ b/notes.md
@@ -208,6 +208,11 @@ Licenses](https://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Springing-licen
 
 Lawrence Rosen's book *Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law* uses the term "eventual source".
 
+And Kyle Mitchell just published (as we were in the middle of doing
+this research) the blog post [A Short, Simple Template for Scheduled
+Relicensing](https://writing.kemitchell.com/2023/10/24/Scheduled-Relicensing),
+that should probably at least be referenced from our report.
+
 # Enforceability
 
 The Creative Commons review seems to have been concerned that springing
-- 
GitLab