From cbb439c2f111e699c945b11eb5480af96c3f2a04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seth Schoen <schoen@loyalty.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 23:32:28 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Checked other database licenses for DOSP-nature

---
 notes.md | 22 +++-------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/notes.md b/notes.md
index 1a9d35c..cf0b7eb 100644
--- a/notes.md
+++ b/notes.md
@@ -8,25 +8,9 @@ Databases licensed under BUSL:
 
 https://dbdb.io/browse?license=business-source-license&q=
 
-Licenses indexed there that I'm not familiar with and that we should double-check for possible
-DOSP-nature:
-
-```
-Code Project Open License
-Commons Clause License
-Elastic License v2
-Fair Source License
-Microsoft Reference Source License
-Mulan PubL v2
-OpenLDAP Public License
-Open Software License 3.0
-Parity Public License
-Server Side Public License
-VoltDB Proprietary License
-```
-
-We can also do a search for particular SPDX values, like "BUSL" or "BUSL-1.1", in a SPDX line --
-probably on GitHub!
+Elastic License v2 - has hosting noncompete clause but no conversion to FOSS
+
+We can also do a search for particular SPDX values, like "BUSL" or "BUSL-1.1", in a SPDX line -- probably on GitHub!
 
 # Examples
 
-- 
GitLab