From 8b4e3a6d5783363e3f5f63254346fdcf3767af95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seth Schoen <schoen@loyalty.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2023 23:21:34 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add a TODO about noncompetition clauses and BUSL AUGs

---
 dosp-survey.ltx | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/dosp-survey.ltx b/dosp-survey.ltx
index 137f9a7..1342151 100644
--- a/dosp-survey.ltx
+++ b/dosp-survey.ltx
@@ -365,6 +365,14 @@ source licensing in the past few years also adopted license terms with
 non-competition clauses. However, these generally were not time-limited.
 % TODO: double-check whether any of them were time-limited
 
+% TODO: This relates back to the AUG topic because so many of the database
+%       companies added AUGs saying that you can do anything you want as
+%       long as it isn't selling hosting of the software and/or doesn't
+%       commercially compete with the developer. The non-time-limited
+%       licenses do something very similar. And Sentry is also doing the
+%       same thing with FSL, but putting it in the core license rather
+%       than in a BUSL AUG.
+
 % I think it's interesting that the AGPL doesn't seem to appeal to most
 % companies that are pursuing this kind of thing. I don't know if any of
 % them have commented on their views about it.
-- 
GitLab