diff --git a/dosp-survey.ltx b/dosp-survey.ltx
index db3365bab511059e4cd19cf29e5b45db39bf9766..1419498e2192441a82efed7b81a924e860892928 100644
--- a/dosp-survey.ltx
+++ b/dosp-survey.ltx
@@ -249,6 +249,20 @@ The AUG mechanism---including optional free-form text that exempts certain
 uses from BUSL's ``production use" restrictions---complicates direct
 comparison of uses of the BUSL; we have not yet devised a taxonomy
 for making these comparisons.
+% TODO We probably won't make such a taxonomy in this report, but we
+% should highlight this as a good next research question.
+
+% TODO Seth mentioned on 2023-11-07 that enforcement of the
+% requirement that an AUG can only grant extra permissions, not add
+% restrictions (for example, how some DB-project licensors narrow the
+% scope of competitive uses by saying that only commercial offering of
+% production database services counts as competitive use) is done
+% through *copyright* on the text of the license itself.  This is
+% interesting; probably worth commenting on somewhere.
+%
+% While narrowing the restrictions to just prevention of competitive
+% use would be an AUG in the BUSL, in Sentry's draft FSL that's the
+% whole point of the license.
 
 % TODO Sort this table by date of BUSL adoption
 \begin{longtable}[l]{l l l l l}
@@ -415,6 +429,10 @@ itself, rather than adding it as an optional additional permission.
 % companies that are pursuing this kind of thing. I don't know if any of
 % them have commented on their views about it.
 
+% TODO (from Karl on 2023-11-07): It's worth raising the question of
+% why more companies don't just choose AGPL instead of resorting to
+% BUSL?  E.g., https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38162275
+
 \numberedsection{Enforceability}\label{enforce}
 
 Delayed open source licensing is less explored than immediate open source
diff --git a/work.md b/work.md
index 8a23155bc341dd85c90c31554ffdd9119270ef7e..3c674e3b143f57583df97d67e2090e683074d036 100644
--- a/work.md
+++ b/work.md
@@ -1,3 +1,29 @@
+# 2023-11-07:
+
+* (James+Karl) High-level organizing and writing in the report.
+
+* (Seth) Did rate of outside contribution change after BUSL
+  relicensing of Terraform, and maybe same for some other project that
+  either didn't have a fork or that had a not-conspicuously-successful
+  fork.  Not sure which project that latter would be, but it would be
+  great if we could identify one for comparison, since the Terraform
+  fork has so conspicuously successful so far.
+
+* (Seth) Similar investigation using bug tracker data instead of
+  commits.
+
+* (Seth) Figure out what other DOSP licenses there are:
+
+  See "Licenses indexed there that I'm not familiar with and that we
+  should double-check for possible DOSP-nature" in notes.md.
+
+* (Seth) Remaining todo items from 2023-11-03 entry below.
+
+* (James+Karl, for now at least) We should raise (but not try to
+  answer) the question of why some BUSL-relicensed projects stimulate
+  flourishing FOSS forks while others do not.  Even within Hashicorp's
+  projects there are pretty dramatic contrasts.
+
 # 2023-11-03: 
 
 * Mark items in notes.md so we know what remains to be investigated in there.