From 6cde05b2b5ebc6da723a46b6f436746309ed6c99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seth Schoen <schoen@loyalty.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:47:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Note controversy about "BUSL" vs. "BSL"

---
 notes.md | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/notes.md b/notes.md
index ddd23f2..bf20000 100644
--- a/notes.md
+++ b/notes.md
@@ -2,6 +2,14 @@ This file contains free-form notes.  Anyone working on this project,
 please feel free to reformat this (including to something other than
 Markdown) if you want.
 
+# An annoying nomenclature problem
+
+Even though we seem to think that the Business Source License should be
+called BUSL, most of its end-users seem to refer to it as BSL!  It
+may be awkward if we end up having a ton of citations where we say
+things like "the project FooWare announced it was using BUSL in 2022
+(see 'Announcing FooCorp's Switch to BSL')".
+
 # Examples
 
 Note that some of these examples are still just pointers that will
-- 
GitLab